Legal Opinion
T.I.M. Co. v. Oklahoma Land Title Ass'n
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 16, 1985No. 59-744PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DOOLIN, Justice.
This ease concerns an application for a certificate of authority to do business as an abstracter in Tulsa County. The parties in this controversy have stipulated that the appellant, T.I.M. Company, Inc. (T.I.M.), an Oklahoma Corporation, has complied with all the statutory requirements, except those imposed by 1 O.S.1981, § 13 (hereinafter § 13), 1 to become a certified bonded abstracter in Oklahoma.
The County Clerk of Tulsa County conducted a public hearing on T.I.M.’s application for a certificate of authority. At the conclusion of the hearing, the county clerk found that…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Lincoln Federal Labor Union v. Northwestern Iron & Metal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Patterson v. Rockwell InternationalTennessee Supreme Court · 1984
- Thayer v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Gladstone v. Bartlesville Independent School District No. 30Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- TORRES v. SEABOARD FOODS, LLCSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
- Ross v. PetersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Rivas v. Parkland ManorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
- Childs v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma State UniversitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.