Legal Opinion
United States v. Samuel Rabinowitz, A/K/A Samuel Robbins, Stanford Sikov and Patrick Howard
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided January 22, 1964No. 15138_1PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TAYLOR, District Judge.
The defendants were indicted on five counts for violation of the mail frauds statute (Title 18 U.S.C. § 1341), and for violation of the statute against aiding and abetting (Title 18 U.S.C. § 2) and on one count for violation of the conspiracy statute (Title 18 U.S.C. § 371). At the arraignment each defendant stood mute and a plea of “Not Guilty” was. entered for each. Before the trial, defendant Sikov changed his plea to “nolo1 contendere” and received a suspended sentence.
Defendants, Rabinowitz and Howard, were each found “GUILTY of the charges contained in the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Durland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Henderson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1953
- Harrison v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1912
- George Beck v. The United States of America, David R. Tuthill v. The United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
- Silverman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- United States v. James Harrison HathawayCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Regent Office Supply Co., Inc., and Oxford Office Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- United States v. Seymour Pollack, United States of America v. Paul M. Sachs, United States of America v. William CuddCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- Darell Nash, Sr. v. Michelle EberlinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Ira Henderson MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.