Silverman v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HOLMES, Circuit Judge.
Appellant was found guilty by a jury on an indictment charging him with using the mails to accomplish a scheme to defraud, in violation of Sections 1341 and 1342 of Title 18 of the United States Code, and from the judgment entered upon the verdict he appeals to this court.
Necessary elements of the offenses are as follows: (1) intention to defraud, and (2) execution of the intention by use of the mails. The scheme need not be fraudulent upon its face, and need not misrepresent any fact, because all that is necessary is that it be a scheme reasonably calculated to deceive…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Durland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Harrison v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1912
- Kaufmann v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1922
- Fournier v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1932
- Oesting v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1916
3Cited by47 opinions
- United States v. Jerry R. BohonusCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Regent Office Supply Co., Inc., and Oxford Office Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- United States v. Earl BushCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
- Howard A. Blachly and Robert L. McMillen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- United States v. James T. McNeiveCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.