Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Bell

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided February 15, 1955No. Cr. No. 211-54PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAWS, Chief Judge.

Following the opinion of this Court on January 10,1955,126 F.Supp. 612, defendants moved for reconsideration of the motion to quash warrants and suppress evidence. In addition, a motion to quash arrest without warrant and suppress evidence have been argued on behalf of defendants Owens and Wright.

Defendants argue all operative facts must be disclosed in an affidavit for a search or arrest warrant, and it is insufficient to describe persons observed as “known” or “suspected” numbers operators without stating the grounds on which these descriptions are based. It is not…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. Di ReSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Carrado v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953
  3. Richfield Oil Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. United States v. FitzmauriceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
  5. Wyche v. United States. Thorpe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Harold Hanger v. United States of America, Gale Mixen v. United States of America, Loretta Meyer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
  2. Pueblo v. Luciano ArroyoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1961
  3. United States v. Rene RamirezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
  4. Clio King v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1960
  5. United States v. Parnell BowlingCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API