Richfield Oil Corp. v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States
1Per curiam
The Court is of the opinion that the issues raised by this appeal are substantially the same as those decided in Standard Oil Co. v. United States, 337 U. S. 293 (1949). Accordingly, the judgment of the District Court is affirmed.
The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Douglas, Mr. Justice Jackson, and Mr. Justice Burton, while adhering to their views expressed in Standard Oil Co. v. United States, supra, join in affirming the judgment of the District Court in this case. Mr. Justice Frankfurter, not having heard the argument, owing to illness, took no part in the consideration or decision of this…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Standard Oil Co. of California v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
3Cited by48 opinions
- Paul Lessig v. Tidewater Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Karseal Corporation v. Richfield Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- Walker Distributing Company v. Lucky Lager Brewing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- H. W. Martens and Robert A. Maurin, Jr. v. Carl F. Barrett, B. C. Farcell and the Texas CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
- Carrado v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.