United States v. Parnell Bowling
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
EDWARDS, Circuit Judge.
The Fourth Amendment prohibits “unreasonable searches and seizures.” It also specifically allows for searches and seizures upon “probable cause” and the issuance of a judicial warrant. In such cases as Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643, 81 S.Ct. 1684, 6 L.Ed.2d 1081, 84 A.L.R.2d 933 (1961); Aquilar v. State of Texas, 378 U.S. 108, 84 S.Ct. 1509, 12 L.Ed.2d 723 (1964); United States v. Ventresca, 380 U.S. 102, 85 S.Ct. 741, 13 L.Ed.2d 684 (1965); Stoner v. State of California, 376 U.S. 483, 84 S.Ct. 889, 11 L.Ed.2d 856 (1964) and Preston v. United States, 376 U.S. 364, 84 S.Ct.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Preston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Stoner v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- United States v. Martin F. BurkeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Samuel Rosencranz v. United States of America, Anthony Dipietro v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1966
- United States v. Ronald Raymond Ravich and Edward McConnellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- Theodor v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- United States v. Titus Thomas, AKA TeeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.