Legal Opinion

Finkelstein v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided September 1, 1993No. 90-4025CPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WEINSTEIN, Judge.

Defendant has filed a motion for summary judgment on the grounds that plaintiff has insufficient evidence to establish that the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR or Board) decision regarding plaintiffs involuntary separation from the United States Army was arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to the evidence, statutes or regulations. Plaintiffs complaint asks that she be reinstated to active duty and awarded back pay from January 1, 1985, the date of her discharge, and that her records be corrected by removing two passovers for promotion from her…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. United States v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Chappell v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. United States v. MenascheSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. Eastport Steamship Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  5. Myers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Reeves v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
  2. Sanford v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
  3. Lee v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1995
  4. Haselrig v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
  5. Barnes v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API