Legal Opinion

Lauderdale Associates v. Department of Health Services

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 7, 1998No. A080227PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WALKER, J.

The Department of Health Services and its director, Kimberly Belshé (collectively, the Department), appeal the trial court’s judgment for Lauderdale Associates, which does business as Alhambra Convalescent Hospital (Alhambra), in Alhambra’s action seeking breach of contract damages and equitable relief. The court determined that Alhambra is entitled to retroactive Medi-Cal reimbursement from the Department for skilled nursing services provided to three patients at Alhambra. The Department contends that: (1) we should reject the equitable doctrine permitting recovery as…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bowers v. BernardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  2. Maslow v. MaslowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  3. Krause v. ApodacaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. Wirz v. WirzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  5. Ortzman v. Van Der WaalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Goebel v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  2. LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA v. CalOPTIMACalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  3. Clinica De Salud Del Valle etc. v. Douglas CA3California Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. Opinion No. (2003), California Attorney General Reports2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API