Legal Opinion

Adams v. Vaill

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided November 13, 1969PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHouse, J.

This action was commenced in 1958 with the plaintiffs’ complaint that the operation by the defendant The Lime Rock Corporation, hereinafter referred to as the defendant, of a track for the racing of automobiles “generally without mufflers or other devices to silence the exhaust from such engines” constituted “a nuisance and irreparable injury” to the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs sought a permanent injunction to abate the alleged nuisance. The court (Shea, J.) filed a memorandum of decision which noted: “The noise becomes irritating, annoying, and disturbing to the comfort of the community when…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. System Federation No. 91 v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Raley v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Wright v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Collens v. New Canaan Water Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
  5. Jennings v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1954

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Kellems v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  2. United Aircraft Corporation v. FusariSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  3. International Business MacHines Corporation v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
  4. Rosado v. Bridgeport Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  5. AvalonBay Communities, Inc. v. Plan & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API