Ohio River & W. Ry. Co. v. Dittey
District Court, S.D. Ohio
In Equity. Suits by the Ohio River & Western Railway Company against Robert M. Dittey, Frank E. Munn, and Christian Pabst, as the Tax-Commission of Ohio, and the Tax Commission of Ohio, and by the Marietta, Columbus & Cleveland Railroad Company against David 5. Creamer, Treasurer of the State of Ohio, Edward M. Fullington, Auditor of the State of Ohio, Timothy S. Hogan, Attorney General of the State of Ohio, Robert M. Dittey, Frank E. Munn, and Christian Pabst, as the Tax…
Read the full summary
In Equity. Suits by the Ohio River & Western Railway Company against Robert M. Dittey, Frank E. Munn, and Christian Pabst, as the Tax-Commission of Ohio, and the Tax Commission of Ohio, and by the Marietta, Columbus & Cleveland Railroad Company against David 5. Creamer, Treasurer of the State of Ohio, Edward M. Fullington, Auditor of the State of Ohio, Timothy S. Hogan, Attorney General of the State of Ohio, Robert M. Dittey, Frank E. Munn, and Christian Pabst, as the Tax Commission of Ohio, and the Tax Commission of Ohio. On complainants’ application for preliminary injunction and demurrers…
1Per curiam
Jurisdiction of these cases is vested in this court through the presence of certain federal questions, no matter how it shall be found necessary to decide them, or whether to decide them at all. Siler v. Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co., 213 U. S. 175, 29 Sup. Ct. 451, 53 L. Ed. 753; Mich. Cent. R. R. Co. v. Vreeland, 227 U. S. 59, 33 Sup. Ct. 192, 57 L. Ed. —, decided January 20, 1913; L. & N. R. Co. v. Siler (C. C.) 186 Fed. 176. The plaintiff in each of the cases is an Ohio corporation, whose line of road lies wholly within the state. In each case the plaintiff challenges the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Flint v. Stone Tracy Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Michigan Central Railroad v. VreelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Taylor v. SecorSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Connolly v. Union Sewer Pipe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Willcox v. Consolidated Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Baca v. ChavezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1927
- Ohio v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1916
- Mutual Film Co. v. Industrial CommissionDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1914
- Air-Way Electric Appliance Corp. v. ArcherDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1922
- Rail & River Coal Co. v. YapleDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1914
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.