Rail & River Coal Co. v. Yaple
District Court, N.D. Ohio
In Equity. Suit by the Rail & River Coal Company against Wallace D. Yaple and others, as members of and constituting the Industrial Commission of Ohio. On application for an interlocutory injunction.
1Per curiam
The plaintiff, a West Virginia corporation, a large producer of coal and employer of mine laborers, of whom there are more than 45,000 in Ohio, assails the constitutionality of the Ohio law of February 5, 1914 (104 Ohio Daws, p. 181), entitled “An act to regulate the weighing of coal at the mines,” and asks for an interlocutory injunction against the defendants, who constitute the Industrial Commission of Ohio, to prevent them from enforcing and attempting to enforce any of the provisions of such act. The act, in so far as it need be considered, is set forth in the margin.1
*277[1] Diversity of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Flint v. Stone Tracy Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Michigan Central Railroad v. VreelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Siler v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Hudson County Water Co. v. McCarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- German Alliance Insurance v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Virginian Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Nolen v. RiechmanDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1915
- Geiger Jones Co. v. TurnerDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1916
- United Railroads v. City & County of San FranciscoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1917
- Hebe Co. v. CalvertDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1917