Sermuks v. Automatic Aluminum Heel Co.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.
On March 15, 1920, the plaintiff entered into a contract with the defendant by the terms of which he agreed to work for the term of one year from date as superintendent of the defendant’s die casting department at a salary of $75 a week, payable weekly, and a bonus of $75 for each die casting die made during that period. The plaintiff worked under that contract until August 4, 1920, when the parties entered into another contract in writing, the essential parts of which are as follows:
" 1. The parties to this agreement have alreadyentered into a contract of employment of the said party of the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Randall v. Peerless Motor Car Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Daniels v. NewtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
- Deane v. CaldwellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879
- Burnham v. DowdMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Speirs v. Union Drop Forge Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Narragansett Amusement Co. v. Riverside Park Amusement Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
- Bendetson v. CoolidgeMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
- Carrig v. Gilbert-Varker Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- McClintic-Marshall Co. v. FreedmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- International Business Machines Corp. v. Quinn Bros. Electrical Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947