Legal Opinion · Dissent

Stanislaus County v. United States

District Court, N.D. California

Decided February 7, 1964No. Civ. No. 8471Published

1DissentMacBRIDE, District Judge

For the reasons stated below, I feel compelled to dissent from the conclusion reached in the majority opinion, though if this were a matter of first impression, or if we were free to substitute our judgment for that of the Commission, my disposition might be different.

This is an action to set aside a negative order of the Interstate Commerce Commission in a case brought by plaintiffs under 49 U.S.C. § 3(1) to remove a rate disparity between two areas.

The Commission stated the ultimate statutory finding on which its order is based as follows: “On further consideration, we find that the rates…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Radio Officers' Union of the Commercial Telegraphers Union v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Rochester Telephone Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Virginian Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. Corn Products Refining Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Swayne & Hoyt, Ltd. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API