Stanislaus County v. United States
District Court, N.D. California
1DissentMacBRIDE, District Judge
For the reasons stated below, I feel compelled to dissent from the conclusion reached in the majority opinion, though if this were a matter of first impression, or if we were free to substitute our judgment for that of the Commission, my disposition might be different.
This is an action to set aside a negative order of the Interstate Commerce Commission in a case brought by plaintiffs under 49 U.S.C. § 3(1) to remove a rate disparity between two areas.
The Commission stated the ultimate statutory finding on which its order is based as follows: “On further consideration, we find that the rates…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Radio Officers' Union of the Commercial Telegraphers Union v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Rochester Telephone Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Virginian Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Corn Products Refining Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Swayne & Hoyt, Ltd. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.