Lightning Litho, Inc. v. Danka Industries, Inc.
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
VAIDIK, Judge.
Case Summary
Lightning Litho, Inc. (Litho) contends the trial court erred in granting the defendants’ motion for judgment on the evidence on its fraudulent inducement claim. In particular, Litho argues that it presented sufficient evidence to support its request for damages. Because we find that the proper measure of damages in fraudulent inducement cases is the benefit of the bargain rule and that there is evidence in the record to support an award of benefit of the bargain damages, we reverse the trial court.
Facts and Procedural History
Thomas Haab is the owner of Litho,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Prospect Development Co. v. BershaderSupreme Court of Virginia · 1999
- Pace v. ParrishUtah Supreme Court · 1952
- Haynes v. Cumberland Builders, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1976
- Lundin v. ShimanskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
- Clark v. HaggardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- America's Directories Inc. v. Stellhorn One Hour Photo, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- Brumley v. Commonwealth Business ColLege Education Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Kapoor v. DybwadIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
- Tru-Cal, Inc. v. Conrad Kacsik Instrument Systems, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2009
- Goodrich & Pennington Mortgage Fund, Inc. v. J.R. Woolard, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2004
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.