Legal Opinion

Super Tire Market, Inc. v. Rollins

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 1966No. 10531PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Justice.

Plaintiff Super Tire Market sues for a balance of $1233.02 on an account for truck tires supplied to the defendant. Defendant does not dispute the correctness of the account, but claims that certain of the tires failed to measure up to a warranty given, from which the damage exceeds the amount due on the account. The trial court found for the plaintiff. Defendant appeals, contending that the evidence compels a finding in his favor on the issue of breach of warranty.

Super Tire Market of Salt Lake City has branches in other towns in Utah including Provo. Clyde Rollins, dba…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. De Vas v. NobleUtah Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Holland v. BrownUtah Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Page v. Federal Security Insurance CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1958
  4. In Re the Estate of BaxterUtah Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Ogden Iron Works v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1942

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Del Porto v. NicoloUtah Supreme Court · 1972
  2. T-Mobile USA, Inc. v. Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Howarth v. OstergaardUtah Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Hanover Ltd. v. FieldsUtah Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Cannon v. WrightUtah Supreme Court · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API