Legal Opinion

State v. Mullen

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided August 20, 1979No. 79-180PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendant has been charged with operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated (second offense). RSA 262-A:62 I, as amended, Laws 1979, 362:1 (hereinafter cited as RSA 262-A:62 I (as amended)). The defendant pleaded not guilty and, pending trial on the merits, the District Court {Harkaway, J.) transferred three important questions of law concerning interpretation of this recently enacted statute. RSA 491:17.

RSA 262-A:62 I (as amended) reads, in pertinent part,, as follows:

Upon conviction based on a complaint which alleges that the person has had a prior conviction in this state or another…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. WentworthSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
  2. Corson v. Brown Products, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
  3. State v. BurroughsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
  4. State v. DeanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975
  5. State v. ValrandSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1961

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. PuglieseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
  2. In Re Russell C.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
  3. Appeal of Concord Natural Gas Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
  4. Town of Nottingham v. HarveySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
  5. King v. SununuSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API