Karczewski v. Ford Motor Company
District Court, N.D. Indiana
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ALLEN SHARP, District Judge.
At the conclusion of all of the evidence the defendant filed a motion for directed verdict pursuant to Rule 50(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in writing, upon which the Court reserved ruling. On September 30, 1974 the defendant filed its motion pursuant to 50(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Since both of these motions raise the same issues the Court will consider them together.
On September 17, 1974, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant in the sum of $10,000.00. Judgment…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- The Boeing Company v. Daniel C. ShipmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
- Brady v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1964
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Jacques v. Montana National GuardMontana Supreme Court · 1982
- Hahn v. Ford Motor Co., Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1982
- Hyundai Motor America, Inc. v. GoodinIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
- Paper Manufacturers Co. v. Rescuers, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1999
- Johnson v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1974
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.