United States v. Hosie
U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review
1Per curiam
We have examined the record of trial, the assignment of error, and the Government’s reply thereto and have concluded that the findings and sentence are correct in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to the substantial rights of the appellant was committed.
In our opinion the record discloses substantial compliance with United States v. Booker, 5 M.J. 238 (C.M.A.1977), with respect to appellant’s prior nonjudicial punishment of 28 December 1977. The accused signed a statement acknowledging his right to consult with independent counsel and voluntarily, knowingly, and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. BookerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
- United States v. BookerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978
- United States v. RiveraU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1978
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. ArvieU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1979
- United States v. DoranU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1979
- United States v. HowardU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1979
- United States v. DoranU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1979