United States v. Howard
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
FULTON, Senior Judge:
Although pleading not guilty, the appellant was convicted, in a special court-martial bench trial, of wrongfully possessing a switchblade knife in violation of general regulations, assaulting Sergeant Pingley and Specialist Four Pooler with a means (the knife) likely to produce grievous bodily harm, and threatening to kill Specialist Pooler.1 The adjudged sentence included a bad-conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for four months, forfeiture of $250.00 pay per month for five months, and reduction to the grade of Private E-l. The convening…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. BookerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
- United States v. MathewsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
- United States v. BookerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978
- United States v. CannonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978
- United States v. BookerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. LeveretteU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1980
- United States v. PanikowskiU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1980