Ostrander v. Clark
Indiana Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Vigo Court of Common Pleas.
1Opinion of the Court
Davison, J".
The complaint charges Ostrander with having committed an assault and battery on Clark, who was the plaintiff, whereby he, Clark, was damaged 500 dollars. The defendant answered, l.Not guilty; 2. Son assault. "Whereupon a jury was impanneled and sworn to try the matters in issue between the parties.
The record contains a bill of exceptions, which shows that after the jury were sworn, and before the case was submitted, the plaintiff moved the Court, without showing any cause by affidavit, or otherwise, in support of his motion, for leave to amend the complaint by adding thereto,…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cited by6 opinions
- Maxwell v. DayIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- Burr v. MendenhallIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
- De Armond v. ArmstrongIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
- Record v. KetchamIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Koons v. PriceIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.