Legal Opinion

De Armond v. Armstrong

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1871PublishedCited by 14 opinions

APPEAL from the Decatur,Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtPettit, J.

This was a suit by the appellee against the appellant for libel. The complaint was in two paragraphs. There was a, motion to strike o.ut the first paragraph, because it was the same as the second, overruled, and exception taken; a motion to strike out parts of this paragraph overruled and exception; and a demurrer for want of sufficient facts to it as a whole, and to its several parts, was filed, overruled, and exception. But we need not notice these rulings, or the errors assigned thereon, because this paragraph was subsequently withdrawn, and the case, so far as it was concerned, dismissed.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ward v. ColyhanIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
  2. Hays v. MitchellIndiana Supreme Court · 1844
  3. Johnson v. StebbinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1854
  4. Proctor v. OwensIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
  5. Smawley v. StarkIndiana Supreme Court · 1857

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hanson v. Globe Newspaper Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
  2. Frederick H. Hope v. Hearst Consolidated Publications, Inc., the Hearst Corporation and Igor CassiniCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
  3. People v. CookMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Burr v. MendenhallIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Prosser v. CallisIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API