Legal Opinion
Jaynes v. Wal-Mart Store No. 824
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided August 30, 1988No. 10761PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ALARID, Judge.
Claimant appeals the denial of her claim for benefits by the Workers’ Compensation Division. Our calendar notice proposed summary affirmance of the hearing officer’s decision. Claimant has filed a memorandum in opposition. The memorandum was filed one day late. We caution claimant’s counsel that a party has a maximum of thirteen days within which to file a memorandum responding to a calendar notice. See SCRA 1986, 12-210(E)(3); SCRA 1986, 12-308(B). Being unpersuaded by claimant’s memorandum, we affirm the hearing officer.
FACTS
Claimant was injured in an accident arising…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sanchez v. Homestake Mining Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985
- Casias v. Zia Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
- Bagwell v. Shady Grove Truck StopNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986
- Martinez v. Driver Mechenbier, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1977
- Chavez v. Lectrosonics, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sanchez v. Memorial General HospitalNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1990
- Par Five Servs., LLC v. N.M. Tax'n & Revenue Dep't and Mosaic Potash Carlsbad Inc. v. N.M. Tax'n & Revenue Dep'tNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2021
- County of Quay v. StoneNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2019
- Martinez v. MontoyaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2018