Legal Opinion

Casias v. Zia Co.

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided August 5, 1980No. 4557PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WOOD, Chief Judge.

The two matters to be decided are: (1) what did the Court of Appeals decide in Casias v. Zia Co., 93 N.M. 78, 596 P.2d 521 (Ct.App. 1979), and (2) whether our workmen’s compensation statute provides for escalating benefits.

A worker’s average weekly wage and the average weekly wage in the state are considered in determining the amount of benefits to be paid to a person entitled to workmen’s compensation. Sections 52-1-20 and 52-1-41, N.M.S.A. 1978. There is no issue as to the calculations concerning these two wage factors. An issue at the trial was the point in time…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Genuine Parts Co. v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Security Insurance Co. of Hartford v. ChapmanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Casias v. Zia Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Primus v. ClarkNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Silva v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Gracia v. BittnerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Bottijliso v. Hutchison Fruit Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Southern Union Exploration Co. v. Wynn Exploration Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Gonzales v. Stanke-Brown & Associates, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. State v. BarrazaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1990

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API