Legal Opinion

Martinez v. Driver Mechenbier, Inc.

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided March 22, 1977No. 2742PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SUTIN, Judge.

A hearing was held to determine whether plaintiff was entitled to workmen’s compensation benefits arising out of defendants’ claim that plaintiff falsified his employment application.

The trial court found that plaintiff knowingly and willfully made false representations as to his physical condition; that the employer relied upon the false representations, a substantial factor in hiring plaintiff; that a causal connection existed between the false representations and the injury claimed.

The trial court concluded that plaintiff was not entitled to workmen’s compensation…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Air Mod Corporation v. NewtonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1965
  2. Cooper v. McDevitt & Street Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1973
  3. Federal Copper & Aluminum Company v. DickeyTennessee Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Perez v. GallegosNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Gray v. J. P. (Bum) Gibbins, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Tallman v. ABF (Arkansas Best Freight)New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Dressler v. Grand Rapids Die Casting Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Shippers Transport of Georgia v. SteppSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  4. Georgia Electric Co. v. RycroftSupreme Court of Georgia · 1989
  5. Goldstine v. Jensen Pre-CastNevada Supreme Court · 1986

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API