Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Brazill v. . Isham

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 5, 1854PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] The award of Stagg the arbitrator, if valid, and insisted upon in the answer of the defendants, would have constituted a legal bar to this action. There is, or ought to be, no difference in the effect…

2Cited by20 opinions

  1. Leidigh Carriage Co. v. StengelCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1899
  2. Altamore v. FriedmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. Behrens v. SkellyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
  4. Bracken v. Atlantic Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  5. Cary v. Western Union Telephone Co.New York Supreme Court · 1888

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API