Legal Opinion

Altamore v. Friedman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 25, 1993PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Invoking the doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel based on a prior arbitration award, the defendant, Ronald Friedman, an attorney, moved to dismiss this legal malpractice action brought against him by the plaintiff, Frank Alta-more, his former client. That motion was granted, and this appeal ensued.

Friedman and Altamore stipulated in writing to binding arbitration conducted under the auspices of the Nassau County Bar Association. The arbitration panel, after a hearing in which they heard both sides, including Altamore’s expert, determined that Friedman…

3Cases cited24 opinions

  1. In re AhoNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Ryan v. New York Telephone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Schwartz v. Public AdministratorNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  4. Schuylkill Fuel Corp. v. B. & C. Nieberg Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
  5. Liss v. Trans Auto Systems, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1986

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by23 opinions

  1. Bankruptcy Services, Inc. v. Ernst & Young (In Re CBI Holding Co.)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  2. Saffer v. WilloughbySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
  3. Ernst & Young & Ernst & Young, LLP v. Bankruptcy Services, Inc. (In Re CBI Holding Co.)District Court, S.D. New York · 2004
  4. Schweizer v. MulvehillDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
  5. Breslin Realty Development Corp. v. ShawAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API