State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Commissioner of Insurance of Nevada
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and State Farm Fire and Casualty Company (“State Farm”) appeal from a district court order affirming a determination of the Commissioner of Insurance relative to State Farm’s calculation of liability insurance premiums. We are asked to determine whether, in the absence of regulatory action, State Farm’s interpretation of the “at-fault” rules set forth in NRS 687B.385 was reasonable. We conclude that it was and, accordingly, we reverse the decision of the district court.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
In 1987, the Nevada legislature enacted NRS 687B.385,…
3Cases cited11 opinions
- General Motors Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. William D. Ruckelshaus, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency, (3 Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- Moody v. Manny's Auto RepairNevada Supreme Court · 1994
- Charlie Brown Construction Co. v. City of Boulder CityNevada Supreme Court · 1990
- Goldstein v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1991
- Erwin v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by12 opinions
- State v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNevada Supreme Court · 2000
- MacK v. Estate of MacKNevada Supreme Court · 2009
- Nevada Fair Housing Center, Inc. v. INC. v. CLARK COUNTYDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2008
- English v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2000
- Nev. Local Gov't Emp.-Mgmt. Relations Bd. v. Educ. Support Emps. Ass'nNevada Supreme Court · 2018
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.