Legal Opinion

State v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 2000No. 31102PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and State Farm Fire and Casualty Company (“State Farm”) filed a declaratory relief action below contesting the validity of a 1996 amendment to NAC 690B.230(2). State Farm argued that the amendment, promulgated by the Division of Insurance of the State of Nevada (“Division”), violated NRS 679B.130(1) by creating a definition of “chargeable accident” which modified, or conflicted with, existing statutes. The Division denied the allegations and asserted that the regulation, as amended, was a reasonable requirement related to the…

3Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Bulbman, Inc. v. Nevada BellNevada Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Moody v. Manny's Auto RepairNevada Supreme Court · 1994
  3. City Council of Reno v. Reno Newspapers, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Charlie Brown Construction Co. v. City of Boulder CityNevada Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Clark County School District v. Local Government Employee-Management Relations BoardNevada Supreme Court · 1974

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by66 opinions

  1. Nelson v. HeerNevada Supreme Court · 2007
  2. International Game Technology, Inc. v. Second Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada Ex Rel. County of WashoeNevada Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Attorney General v. Nevada Tax Comm'nNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Nevada Attorney for Injured Workers v. Nevada Self-Insurers Ass'nNevada Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Meridian Gold Co. v. State Ex Rel. Department of TaxationNevada Supreme Court · 2003

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API