Legal Opinion
Erwin v. State
Nevada Supreme Court
Decided December 19, 1995No. 25812PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Appellant Gerald Erwin owns and operates a telephone sports information service to which customers subscribe and then call in for information at their convenience. In 1993, the legislature amended Chapter 599B, Nevada Revised Statutes, entitled “Solicitation by Telephone,” to require telephone solicitors to register their business with the State, pay an annual fee of $6,000, and post a $50,000 bond. The Attorney General informed Erwin that the statute applied to his business practices. Erwin sought equitable relief and filed a complaint, claiming that Chapter 599B did not apply to his…
3Cases cited20 opinions
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Police Dept. of Chicago v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by25 opinions
- LFC Marketing Group, Inc. v. LoomisNevada Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNevada Supreme Court · 2000
- Pro-Max Corp. v. FeenstraNevada Supreme Court · 2001
- Westpark Owners' Ass'n v. Eighth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 2007
- City Plan Development, Inc. v. Office of the Labor CommissionerNevada Supreme Court · 2005
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.