Legal Opinion

Heidelberg Brewing Co. v. E. F. Prichard, Etc.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided May 5, 1944PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Tilford

Affirming in part and reversing in part.

These appeals involve the validity of a written contract between the parties dated September 10, 1942, and the effect upon the rights secured thereby of an order of the Federal War Production Board issued on March 1, 1943, limiting the quantity of malted grain and malt syrup which might be used in the manufacture of malt beverages to 93% of the quantity so used during the corresponding period of the preceding year.

For more than two years preceding the execution of the written contract, the parties had operated under…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Eminence Distillery Co. v. FremdCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. E. F. Prichard Co. v. Heidelberg Brewing Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1950
  2. Knight v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1950
  3. E. F. Prichard Co., Inc. v. Heidelberg Brewing Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1948
  4. Knight v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1950
  5. Heidelberg Brewing Co. v. E. F. Pritchard Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1949

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API