Legal Opinion
Knight v. Hamilton
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
Decided May 26, 1950PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
233 S.W.2d 969 (1950)
KNIGHT et al.
v.
HAMILTON.
Court of Appeals of Kentucky.
May 26, 1950.
Rehearing Denied December 1, 1950.
James F. Clay, Danville, for appellants.
Joe G. Davis, Chenault Huguely, Henry G. Sandifer, Pierce Lively, all of Danville, for appellee.
REES, Justice.
This is an appeal by Brady Knight and Fred W. Turnbull, partners doing business as Danville Tire & Service Company, from a judgment prohibiting them from breaching certain restrictions contained in a deed dated March 7, 1945, and in a contract of the same date between the grantors and grantees in the deed. The grantors in the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Standard Oil Co. of California v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Pick Manufacturing Co. v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Mills-Morris Co. v. Champion Spark Plug Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1925
- Business Men's Assur. Co. of America v. EadesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
- Fowler's Bootery v. Selby Shoe Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Quinn v. Beverages of West Virginia, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1976
- Elm Hill Homes, Inc. v. JessieCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1993
- McHargue v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1957
- Quinn v. Beverages of W. Va., Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1976