Legal Opinion · Dissent

Chicago Catholic Workers' Credit Union v. Rosenberg

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 25, 1952No. Gen. 45,564Published

1Dissent

Mr. Presiding Justice Burke

Dissenting:

When a garnishee appears or makes discovery the court does not enter a conditional judgment. In the instant case the garnishee appeared and the court had complete jurisdiction over it. Having appeared, the provisions of section 8 of the Garnishment Act were not applicable to the garnishee. The trial judge was right when he entered a final judgment against the garnishee in default of an answer. See Toledo, Wabash & Western R. R. Co. v. Reynolds for Use of Marx, 72 Ill. 487; Carter v. Lockwood, 15 Ill. App. 73, 75; Motor Car Securities Corp. v. Shockley,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Toledo, Wabash & Western Railway Co. v. ReynoldsIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Carter v. LockwoodAppellate Court of Illinois · 1884
  3. Motor Car Securities Corp. v. ShockleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API