Chicago Catholic Workers' Credit Union v. Rosenberg
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Dissent
Mr. Presiding Justice Burke
Dissenting:
When a garnishee appears or makes discovery the court does not enter a conditional judgment. In the instant case the garnishee appeared and the court had complete jurisdiction over it. Having appeared, the provisions of section 8 of the Garnishment Act were not applicable to the garnishee. The trial judge was right when he entered a final judgment against the garnishee in default of an answer. See Toledo, Wabash & Western R. R. Co. v. Reynolds for Use of Marx, 72 Ill. 487; Carter v. Lockwood, 15 Ill. App. 73, 75; Motor Car Securities Corp. v. Shockley,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Toledo, Wabash & Western Railway Co. v. ReynoldsIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
- Carter v. LockwoodAppellate Court of Illinois · 1884
- Motor Car Securities Corp. v. ShockleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1924