Legal Opinion

Carter v. Lockwood

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 20, 1884PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Sidney Smith, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtBailey, J.

In this case, John W. Doane & Co., brought suit in assumpsit against Henry B. Lockwood, to recover an indebtedness of $4,101.42, and afterward sued out a writ of attachment in aid of their suit, and caused Oliver S. Carter, Henry E. Hawley and George II. Maey, the members of the firm of Carter, Hawley & Co., to be named therein as garnishees. The writ was served on Carter only, and he in due time filed his answer in writing under oath to the interrogatories exhibited by the plaintiffs. Said answer being excepted and demurred to by the plaintiffs as insufficient, the exceptions and demurrer…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Chicago Catholic Workers' Credit Union v. RosenbergAppellate Court of Illinois · 1952
  2. Grace v. Casey-Grimshaw Marble Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1896
  3. Motor Car Securities Corp. v. ShockleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1924
  4. Chicago Catholic Workers' Credit Union v. RosenbergAppellate Court of Illinois · 1952
  5. Chicago Catholic Workers' Credit Union v. RosenbergAppellate Court of Illinois · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API