Legal Opinion

Conoley v. Riel

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 21, 1983No. 21908PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Littlejohn, Justice.

This dog-bite action was brought by the Plaintiff-Appellant, a three-year-old child, against the Defendants-Respondents, owners of a dog alleged to have bitten the child, causing pain, suffering and mental anguish which necessitated medical treatment and which resulted in permanent scars. At the end of the plaintiff’s case, the trial judge directed a verdict in favor of the defendants, holding as a matter of law that there was no liability on the part of the dog owners. Plaintiff has appealed, submitting that the judge erred in failing to submit the issues to the jury. We…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mungo v. BennettSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
  2. McQuaig Ex Rel. McQuaig v. BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hossenlopp Ex Rel. Hossenlopp v. CannonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  2. Nesbitt v. LewisCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
  3. Hossenlopp Ex Rel. Hossenlopp v. CannonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API