Legal Opinion
Air Turbine Technology, Inc. v. Atlas Copco Ab, Atlas Copco Tools Ab, Atlas Copco North America, Inc., and Atlas Copco Tools, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided June 7, 2005No. 04-1387PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHALL, Circuit Judge.
Air Turbine Technology, Inc. (“ATT”) is the owner of United States Patent No. 5,439,346 (“the ’346 patent”). ATT sued Atlas Copco AB (“ACAB”), Atlas Copco Tools AB (“ACTAB”), Atlas Copco North America, Inc., and Atlas Copco Tools, Inc. (collectively, “Atlas”) in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida for infringement of the ’346 patent, for violation of the Lanham Act, and for unfair competition under Florida law. In the same action, ATT sued ACTAB separately for breach of contract, fraud, and breach of confidential relationship. ATT now…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hickson Corp. v. Northern Crossarm Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. v. 1-800 Contacts, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- Richard L. Thoen v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Cordis Corp. v. Boston Scientific Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Creative Compounds, LLC v. Starmark LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Eller v. Trans Union, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Zoltek Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Omega Patents, LLC v. Calamp Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.