Legal Opinion

People v. Hoffmann

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 28, 1970No. Crim. 15745PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BRANDLER, J. *

Statement of the Case

By information defendant was charged with assault with intent to commit rape in violation of section 220 of the Penal Code (count I) and burglary in violation of section 459 of the Penal Code (count II) (entering a residence with intent to commit rape). Defendant’s motion to dismiss under Penal Code section 995 was argued and denied. The case proceeded to trial. The court denied a mistrial, and the jury was discharged when it advised the court that it was deadlocked and unable to reach a verdict. The case was then set for retrial. After retrial the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. IbarraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. People v. GorgCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. People v. IngCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. People v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  5. People v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. JenkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. People v. RubioCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  3. People v. RichardsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  4. People v. FreemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  5. People v. CampbellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API