People v. Freeman
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RICHARDSON, J.
Defendant, Phillip Neil Freeman, appeals from a judgment ordering him committed to the Youth Authority after a jury found him guilty of robbery (Pen. Code, § 211). Defendant, who relied solely upon an alibi defense, contends that the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury, on its own motion, regarding the principles underlying that defense. As will appear, we have concluded that although defendant was entitled to the instruction upon request, the trial court did not err in failing to act sua sponte.
The record discloses that a grocery store clerk was robbed by a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- People v. SedenoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- People v. St. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- People v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- People v. RubioCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- People v. WhitsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- People v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- People v. MorrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- People v. BlairCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- People v. AlcalaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Sosinsky v. GrantCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.