Legal Opinion

Carvajal v. City of New York

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 2005PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Allen Hurkin-Torres, J.

*510In Katz v City of New York (87 NY2d 241 [1995]), the Court of Appeals held that, where a plaintiff seeks to establish prior written notice of a sidewalk defect via a map filed by the Big Apple Pothole and Sidewalk Protection Committee, Inc., it “is the most recent map received from Big Apple prior to an accident” that is controlling (id. at 244). That holding was premised, in large part, upon the uncontradicted testimony that it is Big Apple’s policy that subsequent successor maps supercede earlier maps (id.). The question presented here is whether…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Brill v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Katz v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Weinreb v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  5. Quinn v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Adamson v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API