Legal Opinion

Harrington Co. v. Chopke

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided May 13, 1931PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This matter is now before the court on complainant's application to strike out an answer and answer in lieu of plea filed in behalf of the defendant John Chopke. Complainant holding tax sale certificates for certain lands situate in the city of Trenton, described in the bill, filed its bill herein to foreclose defendant's right of redemption of such lands. Complainant prays that the defendants be required to redeem said lands, or, in default of redemption, that they be foreclosed of all rights therein. Section 49 of chapter 237 of the laws of 1918, known as "Tax Sale Revision," as amended by…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Haughwout & Pomeroy v. MurphySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1871
  2. Hermann v. Mexican Petroleum Corp.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1915
  3. Rodgers v. CressmanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1925
  4. Wittes v. RepkoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1930
  5. Bourgeois v. Risley Real Estate Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1913

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Township of Montville v. Block 69, Lot 10Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
  2. Wiltsie v. BelenskiNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
  3. Government Security Co. v. NassoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API