Legal Opinion
Murat v. South Bend Lodge No. 235 of the Benevolent & Protective Order of Elks of the United States
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided September 19, 2008No. 71A04-0712-CV-729PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MAY, Judge.
Armand Murat sought to enjoin the Elks and Burkhart Advertising, Inc. from placing a billboard within an area over which he has an easement for ingress and egress. The trial court issued a temporary restraining order, but later dissolved it and denied Murat’s request for a permanent injunction. We affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On March 27, 1964, Clarence and Martha Dockery conveyed to the Elks a strip of land twenty-three feet wide. The Dock-erys retained an easement:
The Grantors reserve unto themselves, and their respective estates, personal representatives, devisees,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Andersen v. EdwardsAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- Estate of Spry v. Greg & Ken, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- Geico Insurance v. RowellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- Groff v. City of ButlerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
- Hopper Resources, Inc. v. WebsterIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
3Cited by12 opinions
- The Care Group Heart Hospital, LLC v. Roderick J. Sawyer, M.D.Indiana Supreme Court · 2018
- Macy Elevator, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- McCauley v. HarrisIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
- Lily, Inc. d/b/a Weinbach Cafeteria and Fernando Tudela v. Silco, LLC.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2013
- Gold v. RowlandSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.