Lily, Inc. d/b/a Weinbach Cafeteria and Fernando Tudela v. Silco, LLC.
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BROWN, Judge.
Lily, Inc., d/b/a Weinbach Cafeteria and Fernando Tudela (collectively, the “Appellants”) appeal the trial court’s September 6, 2012 order granting summary judgment to Silco, LLC (“Silco”). The Appellants raise seven issues which we consolidate and restate as whether the court erred in granting Silco’s motion for summary judgment. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
In 2003, Four O Three, Inc., and David Nelson, the “owner, member and sole unit holder” of Silco, signed a lease agreement (the “Lease”) dated March 25, 2003, in which…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Mangold Ex Rel. Mangold v. Indiana Department of Natural ResourcesIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
- Rice v. StrunkIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
- Dunn v. Meridian Mutual Insurance Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 2005
- Fresh Cut, Inc. v. FazliIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
- Four Seasons Manufacturing, Inc. v. 1001 Coliseum, LLCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- The Care Group Heart Hospital, LLC v. Roderick J. Sawyer, M.D.Indiana Supreme Court · 2018
- Larry J. Jernas and R & R Horse Haven, Inc. v. Kevin J. GumzIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016
- Entm't USA, Inc. v. Moorehead Commc'ns, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- Gold v. RowlandSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
- Entertainment USA, Inc. v. Moorehead Communications, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2015
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.