Legal Opinion

Herring v. E. I. Du Pont de Nemours Powder Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1911PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from an order of tbe circuit court for Bayfield county: E. ,W. Helks, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

WiNSLow, 0. T.

This case was once here on an appeal from a judgment of nonsuit (139 Wis. 412, 121 N. W. 170), and it was held upon that appeal that the nonsuit was wrongly granted and a new trial was ordered. A new trial has been had and a special verdict rendered, consisting of eight questions and answers which it is unnecessary- to set forth. The defendant moved to change the answers to certain of the questions, for judgment on the verdict, and for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. The plaintiff moved to change the answers to certain of the questions, and in default thereof to set aside…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Herring v. E. I. Du Pont de Nemours Powder Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Giese v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Sly v. Village of Kilbourn CityWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Frost v. MeyerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Schlag v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Comstock v. BuckleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Herring v. E. I. Du Pont de Nemours Powder Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API