Henry v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CAMERON, Justice.
I. JURISDICTION
Patrick Henry (claimant) seeks review of a memorandum decision of the court of appeals which affirmed an Industrial Commission’s (Commission) finding that it lacked jurisdiction to hear the claim. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Ariz. Const., art. 6 § 5(3) and A.R.S. § 23-948.
II. QUESTION
We need answer only one question on review and that is:
Was the claim for Workers’ Compensation benefits timely filed pursuant to A.R.S. § 23-1061(A)? 1
III. FACTS
The facts necessary for a determination of this matter on review are as follows:
Following service in the military,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mead v. American Smelting & Refining CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
- Pacific Fruit Express v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1987
- Hughes v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1956
- Allen v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1987
- Borough of Norwood v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Florez v. SargeantArizona Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. BilkeArizona Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
- Kollasch v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
- State v. KingCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.