Legal Opinion

Henry v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1988No. CV-87-0249-PRPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMERON, Justice.

I. JURISDICTION

Patrick Henry (claimant) seeks review of a memorandum decision of the court of appeals which affirmed an Industrial Commission’s (Commission) finding that it lacked jurisdiction to hear the claim. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Ariz. Const., art. 6 § 5(3) and A.R.S. § 23-948.

II. QUESTION

We need answer only one question on review and that is:

Was the claim for Workers’ Compensation benefits timely filed pursuant to A.R.S. § 23-1061(A)? 1

III. FACTS

The facts necessary for a determination of this matter on review are as follows:

Following service in the military,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mead v. American Smelting & Refining CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  2. Pacific Fruit Express v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Hughes v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Allen v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Borough of Norwood v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Florez v. SargeantArizona Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. BilkeArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  4. Kollasch v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
  5. State v. KingCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2021

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API