Legal Opinion
Funkhouser v. City of Newark
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided March 30, 1960No. Civ. A. No. 798-59PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WORTENDYKE, District Judge.
The present action, based upon the diversity jurisdiction of this Court, is *16essentially in ejectment for interference with plaintiff’s possession of, and for deprivation of rents and profits from lands in this District. The City of Newark, a municipal corporation of the Staté of New Jersey was originally the sole defendant, but, before answer was due, the complaint was amended and Port of New York Authority (Port Authority), a body corporate and politic, created by compact between the States of New York and New Jersey, with the consent of Congress, was joined as a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rao v. Port of New York AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1954
- Howell v. Port of New York AuthorityDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1940
- Port of New York Authority v. Township of WeehawkenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- Port of NY Authority v. Weehawken Tp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
- Toth v. BigelowSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- A-Tek Mechanical, Inc. v. KHW Services, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2022
- PHOENIX PINELANDS CORPORATION, ETC. VS. HARRY DAVIDOFF (C-000246-11, OCEAN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2021