Legal Opinion
Calechman v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 12, 1935PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHaines, J.
The plaintiff brought this action to recover a certain sum claimed to be due him December 1st, 1934, for rent for that month under a lease made by him to the named defendant. The latter filed an answer and a cross-complaint alleging that it was holding rent for five months due under the lease beginning with that due December 1st and extending to the time the pleading was filed, and that Mary Garris was claiming all this rent under a garnishment served on it November 27th; that the plaintiff was claiming the rent due December 1st; that on December 17th, 1934, the plaintiff had assigned all his…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Deane v. CaldwellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879
- Wood v. PartridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1814
- Emerson v. GoodwinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1833
- Bank of Pennsylvania v. WiseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1834
- Parker, Peebles & Knox v. El SaiehSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Glassman v. HyderNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Devore v. LeeSupreme Court of Florida · 1947
- Chambers v. Blickle Ford Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- In Re the Dissolution of the Edgewood Park Junior College, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
- Brunskill v. StutmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.