Legal Opinion
Sweeney v. Meyers
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 15, 1937No. 30,930PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Hilton, Justice.
Appeal from an order denying defendants’ alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial.
Action for damages sustained as a result of the unlawful eviction of plaintiff from his dental offices. Plaintiff had been a practicing dentist since 1905. In 1921 he opened an office at Alexandria, Minnesota, in a building which in 1925 became the property of Mary C. Meyers, one of the defendants here. The other defendant is her husband, Matt P. Meyers. On August 29, 1932, plaintiff went to his office at about 7:30 a. m. About 8:30 he left it, intending to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Nelson v. HalvorsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
- McCarthy v. NiskernSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
- Peck v. SmallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- Watre v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Sticha v. BenzickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Berg v. WileySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Hammersten v. ReilingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
- Poppen v. WadleighSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- Pellowski v. BurkeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- Pellowski v. BurkeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982