Legal Opinion

State v. Woods

Montana Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 2005No. 03-793PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cotter

¶1 Jeremy Cord Woods (Woods) appeals the First Judicial District Court’s denial of his Petition for Postconviction Relief. We affirm.

ISSUE

¶2 The sole issue on appeal is whether the District Court erred when it denied Woods’ Petition for Postconviction Relief. Woods claims such denial was error because: 1) his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to argue that he was subject to a “classic penalty” situation; 2) his appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to raise a juror removal issue; and 3) the District Court violated his constitutional rights when it received and answered…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Minnesota v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. State v. LaMereMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State v. GoodMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Dawson v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2000

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. PlouffeMontana Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Reginald Adgerson v. State.Montana Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Reginald Adgerson v. State.Montana Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. WoodsMontana Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Tyrrel v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API