Legal Opinion
Laster v. T-MOBILE USA, INC.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided November 30, 2005No. 05 CV 1167 DMS(AJB)PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER: (1) DENYING T-MOBILE AND CINGULAR WIRELESS’ MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND TO STAY PROCEEDINGS; (2) GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ UCL AND FAL CLAIMS WITHOUT PREJUDICE; AND (3) GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ CLRA CLAIM FOR DAMAGES WITH PREJUDICE
[Docs. Nos. 24, 28, 32, 36]
SABRAW, District Judge.
In this putative class action, Plaintiffs assert that Defendants — cellular phone companies and other entities involved with the sale of wireless telecommunication services — have engaged in the unfair and deceptive practice of charging consumers sales…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Davis v. SchererSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Kinkel v. Cingular Wireless, LLCIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
- Hall v. Time Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- Shroyer v. New Cingular Wireless Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Chacanaca v. QUAKER OATS COMPANYDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2010
- Low v. Linkedin Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2012
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.