Legal Opinion

People v. Hansen

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 2, 1933No. Docket No. 2309PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARCHBALD, J., pro tem.

Defendant was charged with robbery, the jury returning a 'verdict of guilty. From an order denying his motion for a new trial and from the judgment entered on said verdict he has appealed. No question is raised as to the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict and judgment, but appellant urges that the court erred in giving certain instructions and in refusing to give others requested by him.

The arrest grew out of the robbery of a drug-store in Los Angeles on the evening of July 19, 1932. According to the testimony for the plaintiff, three men entered the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. RaberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  2. People v. HowerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  3. People v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  4. People v. TibbsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Granite Gold Mining Co. v. MaginnessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. AnjellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  2. People v. KennedyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  3. People v. CorlettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  4. People v. DaenerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  5. People v. SanchezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API