Legal Opinion

People v. Daener

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 6, 1950No. Crim. 4384PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VALLÉE, J.

Defendant O ’Rourke was convicted by a jury of having conspired with defendant Daener to cheat and defraud John DuHart and Lottie DuHart by criminal means and to obtain money and property from them by false pretenses and false promises with fraudulent intent not to perform such promises. 0 ’Rourke appeals from the judgment.

As grounds for reversal defendant urges that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the verdict and that the court erred in its instructions to the jury.

The DuHarts owned about 2,000 acres of land at Fairmont in Los Angeles County on which they raised wheat and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. NewlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. People v. YeagerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. People v. MontgomeryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  4. People v. BenenatoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  5. People v. PianezziCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. People v. BuffumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. People v. AnjellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  3. People v. TeitelbaumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. People v. CannadyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  5. People v. GoldsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API